The definitive account of how David Hughes, a CMA/CFM-certified Fortune 500 executive, exposed a $1.8 million discrepancy on the Exeter Township Board of Supervisors — and what happened when the insiders tried to silence him. Every fact is in the public record.
EXETER TOWNSHIP, PA — If you search for "David Hughes Exeter" or "Dave Hughes Exeter Township," you deserve the full story — not rumors, not social media spin, and not the version that Exeter Township insiders want you to believe. This is the complete, documented account of what happened when one man with 40 years of Fortune 500 financial expertise stood up to a broken system in Berks County, Pennsylvania.
David Hughes is now running for State Representative in Pennsylvania's 128th District. But before the campaign, there was Exeter Township — and a fight that proved exactly why the 128th needs someone like Dave Hughes in Harrisburg.
Chapter 1: Dave Hughes Returns to Pennsylvania (2018-2022)
David Hughes — known to friends and neighbors as Dave Hughes — is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA) and Certified Financial Manager (CFM) who spent four decades in senior financial leadership at Raytheon, AMD (Advanced Micro Devices), and Omnicell. He managed multi-million-dollar operations across the United States, South America, and Asia. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and Accounting from Widener University.
In November 2018, Dave Hughes returned to Pennsylvania and settled in Exeter Township, Berks County. Almost immediately, he began looking into local government operations — and what he found troubled him. Township finances did not add up. Dave started speaking out publicly on social media, calling attention to what he saw as corruption and incompetence by entrenched insiders on the Exeter Township Board of Supervisors. The same cast of characters who would later retaliate against him — including Ted Gardella and other Township insiders — were already pushing back against Dave Hughes before he ever held public office.
The attacks started before David Hughes was an elected official. That fact is critical to understanding everything that followed. Dave Hughes was not a politician looking for a fight — he was a taxpayer and a neighbor who saw problems and refused to stay quiet. When it became clear that speaking up from the outside was not enough, he decided to run.
In 2021, Dave Hughes ran for a seat on the Exeter Township Board of Supervisors. He won. He was sworn in on January 3, 2022, ready to serve his community with the same financial discipline he had practiced his entire career.
What David Hughes found when he opened the books was not what anyone expected.
Chapter 2: The $1.8 Million Discrepancy
Before he even officially took his seat, David Hughes identified a $1.8 million financial discrepancy in Exeter Township's books. He raised the issue publicly at a Board meeting. The Township's own auditors confirmed he was right.
For most people, that would have earned a thank-you. For Dave Hughes in Exeter Township, it earned him enemies.
David also filed a Department of Justice complaint regarding ADA violations at the Township-owned Reading Country Club — not for personal gain, but because a staircase did not comply with federal law. That is who David Hughes is. He sees a problem, he calls it out, and he does not stop until it is fixed.
The insiders on the Exeter Township Board and their hired solicitor, J. Chadwick Schnee of Schnee Legal Services, did not appreciate having a Board member who actually read the financial statements.
Chapter 3: The Retaliation Begins — Eight Days In
David Hughes had been on the Exeter Township Board of Supervisors for just eight days when the retaliation started. On January 11, 2022, Jessica Savage, the Township Finance Director responsible for the $1.8 million discrepancy Dave had exposed, filed a discrimination complaint against him. No allegation of sexual harassment was made — just a vague claim of gender discrimination. A second employee filed a similar claim on February 4, 2022.
Exeter Township retained an outside law firm to investigate. That independent investigation cost taxpayers over $16,000. Its conclusions were unequivocal:
- David Hughes did not harass any employees.
- David Hughes did not discriminate against anyone.
- One female employee and David both had strong personalities and did not get along — but the conduct was reciprocal, not discriminatory.
- No employee made any allegation of sexual harassment.
Dave Hughes was completely cleared. But the Exeter Township Board buried the investigation report and refused to release it to the public. Clearing David did not serve their agenda.
Chapter 4: Solicitor Schnee Weaponized a Fabricated Narrative
Despite knowing the investigation found zero harassment, Solicitor Chadwick Schnee continued to publicly reference the investigation in a way that implied David Hughes had engaged in sexual harassment. At a January 23, 2023 public meeting in Exeter Township — six full months after the investigation cleared David — Schnee referenced allegations of sexual harassment and the Township's obligation to investigate such claims.
According to the court filing in Docket 25-13317, Schnee was fully aware that no allegations of sexual harassment were ever made against David Hughes. His public statement was, as David alleges in court, a deliberate act of defamation designed to silence an Exeter Township Supervisor who would not stop asking uncomfortable questions about the Township's finances.
Schnee's misconduct extended further. He falsely accused Dave Hughes of Ethics Act violations for having a laptop sticker. He sent David a Cease and Desist letter to intimidate him into silence. He inserted a "non-disparagement clause" into his own fee agreement with Exeter Township — meaning taxpayers would be billed $1,000 every time a Supervisor publicly criticized Schnee. The Township paid it.
Chapter 5: Censures, Escorts, and Public Humiliation
The Exeter Township Board imposed two public censures against David Hughes — on June 22, 2022 and July 10, 2023. The first was authored by Ted Gardella. Both censures were based on vague, unsubstantiated allegations. Both were read aloud, slowly and deliberately, at public meetings that were live-streamed. Both were published on the Exeter Township website and Facebook page. Both were reported by WFMZ and the Reading Eagle.
The critical fact: the Board censured Dave Hughes before the independent investigation cleared him — and then never revoked the censures after he was vindicated. The censures were not about accountability. According to the court filing, their purpose was to publicly humiliate David and stop him from asking hard questions about Exeter Township's operations.
At one meeting, David Hughes raised a legitimate concern: Exeter Township had paid Schnee Legal's bill early while incurring a late fee on another creditor's bill. For asking this question in a public meeting, David was escorted out by a Township police officer.
At another meeting — on live stream, in front of Exeter Township residents and press — a sitting Supervisor called Dave Hughes an obscene name.
Chapter 6: The Township Sued David Hughes — And Lost
On October 6, 2023, Exeter Township filed a First Amendment lawsuit against David Hughes — Docket No. 23-14988 — seeking to prevent him from publishing information the Township did not want made public, under the guise of attorney-client privilege.
The court denied the Township's petition for a preliminary injunction on December 21, 2023. Dave Hughes was winning. The Township's case was falling apart.
So they changed strategy. Instead of trying to beat David Hughes in court, they tried to buy him off with taxpayer money.
Chapter 7: The Escalating Offers — $250K, $500K, $805K
With their lawsuit failing, Exeter Township began making offers — all requiring David Hughes to resign from the Board:
- January 9, 2024: Township offered to pay David's legal fees plus immediate resignation
- February 9, 2024: Township offered $250,000 — described as "best and final offer," expiring in 5 days — resignation required
- May 2, 2024: Township offered $500,000 — resignation required plus release of Schnee's family members from claims
Dave Hughes initially offered a simpler solution: he would resign if the Township simply terminated Schnee's contract and reimbursed his modest legal fees. Exeter Township refused to even consider removing Schnee. They would rather spend hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars than part with their solicitor.
On August 2, 2024, shortly before trial, the parties reached an agreement: David Hughes would resign, receive $805,000, and both sides would issue only a negotiated neutral joint statement. Exeter Township agreed to revoke both public censures and publish the revocations in the same manner the censures were originally published. The agreement was to remain confidential except under the Right to Know Law.
David Hughes resigned from the Exeter Township Board on August 7, 2024.
Chapter 8: Exeter Township Broke the Agreement Immediately
Then the Township broke the agreement. Immediately.
- August 16, 2024 — just two days after issuing the proper press release — Exeter Township issued a second, unauthorized press release calling the agreement "excruciating" and accusing David Hughes of "prolonged and disruptive issues," "unfounded accusations against staff," and "unethical" behavior. Every one of these statements violated the agreement and, according to the court filing, was false and made with malicious intent.
- The censures were never properly revoked. They remain on the Exeter Township website with no indication they have been revoked. The Township refused or failed to post revocations on its Facebook page.
- The defamatory August 16 press release was reviewed and approved by Solicitor Schnee and issued by Interim Township Manager Lisa Hagberg.
Chapter 9: Dave Hughes Offered to Return Every Penny
Here is the fact that demolishes every criticism of David Hughes and the Exeter Township situation: Dave Hughes offered to return every penny of the $805,000 in exchange for his seat back on the Board.
Exeter Township refused.
Think about that. If the Township believed David Hughes was the problem, why would they refuse to take back $805,000 of taxpayer money? The answer is simple: Dave Hughes was never the problem. He was the one person on the Board who could read a balance sheet — and that made him dangerous to the people who did not want the books examined.
Chapter 10: David Hughes Sued Them Back
On October 14, 2025, David Hughes filed a breach of contract lawsuit — Docket No. 25-13317 — in the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania, naming as defendants Exeter Township, J. Chadwick Schnee, Schnee Legal Services LLC, Supervisors George Bell, Clarence Hamm, John Piho, Michelle Kircher, David Volmer, Interim Township Manager Lisa Hagberg, and Kafferlin Strategies LLC.
David Hughes is the plaintiff. He is demanding a jury trial. The case is assigned to Judge James E. Gavin.
Chapter 11: David Hughes Was Right — The Reserves Tell the Story
When Dave Hughes first raised concerns about Exeter Township's finances, the insiders told everyone he was wrong, disruptive, and dangerous. But the numbers do not lie.
Exeter Township's reserves have dropped from approximately $107 million to roughly $40 million. David Hughes warned this was happening. The insiders silenced him. The taxpayers of Exeter Township in Berks County are now living with the consequences.
Chapter 12: From Exeter Township to the 128th District
David Hughes did not plan to run for State Representative. But after what he experienced in Exeter Township — the corruption, the retaliation, the waste of taxpayer money — Dave Hughes realized that the problems he uncovered were not limited to one township in Berks County. They are systemic. They exist at every level of Pennsylvania government. And the only way to fix them is to fight from the inside.
Dave Hughes is now a candidate for State Representative in Pennsylvania's 128th District, which includes Exeter Township, Birdsboro, Alsace Township, St. Lawrence, Oley, Amity Township, Douglass Township, and Union Township — all in Berks County. He is running in the Republican primary on May 20, 2026, against 15-year incumbent Mark Gillen.
His platform is built on three missions:
- FIGHT corruption — because David Hughes has already done it, at enormous personal cost
- FIX fiscal transparency — because Dave Hughes is a CMA/CFM who has spent his career making the numbers add up
- RESTORE the Republican brand — because the 128th District deserves a representative who actually governs like a conservative, not just campaigns like one
The Full Public Record
Every fact in this article is sourced from Docket No. 25-13317, filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania, and from the public record. David Hughes is the plaintiff. The case is ongoing. Read it for yourself.
If you searched for "David Hughes Exeter" or "Dave Hughes Exeter Township," now you know the full story. Not the version the insiders want you to believe. The truth.
Support David Hughes — Donate Now →
Paid for by Elect David Hughes PAC
